i don’t tumblr much any more

but my friend is happy and beautiful <3

from vivid-eris
foucault & gay marriage

ourcatastrophe:

everybody brings up foucault as their go-to radical queer who would just HATE gay marriage and whatever, but I have this vague recollection that his actual position on marriage was a bit less readily pigeonholed.  didn’t he say something to the effect that legally sanctioned marriage between queers would be more of a threat to the current social order than legalised queer sex?  maybe in an interview or something?  does anybody know what I’m talking about?  it’s really difficult for me to find this out by googling because all I get is a million blog posts saying “gay radicals like French philosopher Michel Foucault would just HATE this” and it’s driving me up the wall. I just wanna knowwwwwwwwwww. am I just making shit up? 

yes, i think i know exactly the material you’re referring to - the title escapes me, but i believe it’s from an interview with a french gay newspaper, and i think it’s reprinted in ethics: subjectivity and truth

i thought at first that it was “friendship as a way of life” from that collection, but i found a PDF of that and it doesn’t appear to be the exact piece i’m thinking of, though there’s a good deal of conceptual overlap

and i know that leo bersani critiques it in homos, basically claiming that it’s part of what he sees as foucault’s reactionary anti-psychoanalytic stance that over-emphasizes the importance of social structures and downplays the power of desire / sex / abjection / etc

as i recall it, foucault claims that while we usually think that heterosexuals / heterosexist discourses are averse to queer sex in an of itself, he believes that it’s not so much gay sex per se that is repugnant to them, but rather the social positions and interpersonal relationships that gayness and queer sexual relations make possible

hence why he sees gay marriage as a potentially productive possibility - these juridical structures matter, and legal gay marriage could help push the meaning of marriage in useful new directions, as well as offering material and social resources to support a variety of interesting / radical / pleasurable queer social configurations, which might or might not look at all similar to ‘traditional heterosexual marriage’ (something of a moving target itself)

he also mentions in this piece wanting to expand the possibilities of other legal relationships; i remember him talking about adoption, as well, and musing about the interesting things that might happen if, say, an adult man could legally adopt a friend or lover his own age or even older - so he’s certainly not putting all his eggs in the marriage basket, either

eta: found my copy of homos; the piece i was thinking of is an interview reprinted as “sexual choice, sexual act” in ethics and a couple other places; JSTOR has it at http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40547562?uid=3739616&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101951243531

from ourcatastrophe

ourcatastrophe:

re

something I see a lot in people with depression is a sense of oneself and others as unreal, without substance, and morally depraved — and consequently, an obsession with authenticity.  think Holden Caulfield, if you must

ideas of authenticity can also be a form of protection against having to challenge your ideas or change — temporarily painful things that are necessary if you don’t wanna be depressed your whole life.  short-term, it’s easier to sit with an idea of yourself as worthless and the universe as hostile than it is accept that your whole worldview might be affected by mental illness, that you can’t rely on your mind, I mean that’s terrifying, how can you even begin to fight that?  and it feels right to wallow in that bleakness, it feels like you’re facing a harsh truth, it feels good to hurt yourself like that. 

if I wasn’t opposed to a radical separation between mental illnesses and authentic (lol) personality I’d say that ideas of authenticity are a form of parasitic self-protection by the depression itself

so Authenticity is obviously an idea that’s really damaging to a lot of people with mental illnesses

but that also means people spouting a lot of nonsense about authenticity who are themselves mentally ill, rather than just opportunistic New Agers, should be cut some slack, because it’s literally part of that illness

from ourcatastrophe

loneberry:

STAR: Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries

From “RAPPING WITH A STREET TRANSVESTITE REVOLUTIONARY: An Interview with Marcia [sic] Johnson,” published in Out of the Closets: Voices of Gay Liberation (1972)

I remember when STAR was first formed there was a lot of discussion about the special oppression that transvestites experience. Can you say something about that?

We still feel oppressed by other gay brothers. Gay sisters don’t think too bad of transvestites. Gay brothers do. I went to a dance at Gay Activist Alliance just last week, and there was not even one gay brother that came over and said hello. They’d say hello, but they’d get away very quick. The only transvestites they were very friendly with were the ones that looked freaky in drag, like freak drag, with no tits, no nothing. Well, I can’t help but have tits, they’re mine. And those men weren’t too friendly at all. Once in a while, I get an invitation to Daughters of Bilitis, and when I go there, they’re always warm. All the gay sisters come over and say, “Hello, we’re glad to see you,” and they start long conversations. But not the gay brothers. They’re not too friendly at all toward transvestites.

Do you understand why? Do you have an explanation for that?

Of course I can understand why. A lot of gay brothers don’t like women! And transvestites remind you of women. A lot of the gay brothers don’t feel too close to women, they’d rather be near men, that’s how come they’re gay. And when they see a transvestite coming, she reminds them of a woman automatically, and they don’t want to get too close or too friendly with her.

This part of the interview jumped out at me because its discussion of the relationship between cis-lesbians and trans women departs significantly from the way the dynamics of that era get historicized now. Anyhoo, thought it was interesting because it anticipates many of the issues Julia Serano would write about decades later in Whipping Girl.

from beefbludd
nitanahkohe:

UGHHHHH saw this on my fb feed—i hate this problematic strand of traditionalism so much!!
Native communities had some form of governance (i can’t think of a single one that had absolutely no governing community social structure set in place)
the climate has been changing periodically over millennia and Native peoples have been adapting for millennia—Natives are not some prehistoric species that have remained static for 25,000 years, and neither are their lands! i get that they mean human-created global warming, but this whole idea of Natives as magically in touch w/the earth is hella old and hella racist—believe it or not white ppl were once “primitive” and weren’t destroying the climate either
Native peoples definitely had markets?? as in they traded things routinely, and some cultures had concepts of cash?? 
Natives are not some prehistoric animal w/mental capacities of infants, and this kinda bullshit traditionalism (which btw is obvi created by non-Natives considering they wrote “they” to signify Natives—hella problematic that Natives are letting non-Natives tell them what their precolonial societies looked like and casting that as indigenous resistance) is really dangerous (note how it’s couched aesthetically in an Edward Curtis photo playing on the noble extinct Indian princess trope?? now let’s talk abt how traditionalism is often brought up to reinforce internalized colonial heteropatriarchy that isn’t actually reflective of Native cultural norms re: gender and sexuality).  this whole “let’s return to this romantic notion of premodern primitive simple life that btw totally only occurred in indigenous communities—white ppl were never primitive!!!” thing is just annoying and inaccurate and racist, and it makes me sad to see indigenous people regurgitate it in their activism.

nitanahkohe:

UGHHHHH saw this on my fb feed—i hate this problematic strand of traditionalism so much!!

  • Native communities had some form of governance (i can’t think of a single one that had absolutely no governing community social structure set in place)
  • the climate has been changing periodically over millennia and Native peoples have been adapting for millennia—Natives are not some prehistoric species that have remained static for 25,000 years, and neither are their lands! i get that they mean human-created global warming, but this whole idea of Natives as magically in touch w/the earth is hella old and hella racist—believe it or not white ppl were once “primitive” and weren’t destroying the climate either
  • Native peoples definitely had markets?? as in they traded things routinely, and some cultures had concepts of cash?? 

Natives are not some prehistoric animal w/mental capacities of infants, and this kinda bullshit traditionalism (which btw is obvi created by non-Natives considering they wrote “they” to signify Natives—hella problematic that Natives are letting non-Natives tell them what their precolonial societies looked like and casting that as indigenous resistance) is really dangerous (note how it’s couched aesthetically in an Edward Curtis photo playing on the noble extinct Indian princess trope?? now let’s talk abt how traditionalism is often brought up to reinforce internalized colonial heteropatriarchy that isn’t actually reflective of Native cultural norms re: gender and sexuality).  this whole “let’s return to this romantic notion of premodern primitive simple life that btw totally only occurred in indigenous communities—white ppl were never primitive!!!” thing is just annoying and inaccurate and racist, and it makes me sad to see indigenous people regurgitate it in their activism.

from nitanahkohe
when i have to poop on my lunch break i hold out til i clock back in

vvarinn:

nanjou:

so gamestop has to pay me to poop

Always Get Paid To Poop

five words you can and should life your life by imo

(Source: ballsackula)

from monetizeyourcat
hey, look at this affordable, trans, queer, cool housing in atlanta near GSU / AUC / turner field / downtown! 
great people! cheap room! yay!
this is currently an all-trans* household and they&#8217;d love another trans roommate, but right now they really need another person to be paying rent and will gladly work with someone respectful and responsible regardless of trans status
c4sale:

misha-chaos:

beefbludd:

feministpizza:

feministpizza:

Any trans* people in Atlanta looking for a place to live?
My roommates and I are looking for a trans*/gender nonconforming individual to rent a room here in our big, lovely house. It’s located near Turner Field and is convenient to GA State, Cabbagetown, East Atlanta, Grant Park, I-20 and 75/85. There are five of us who live here already and we’d love to have someone (preferably in their 20s) move in ASAP. Message me for rent info and any other questions you may have.
Even if you’re not interested in moving in, I’d appreciate my Atlanta friends and followers reblogging this to spread the word!

Still looking for another roommate. We’re all really nice and sweet and fun! Most of us are activists and organizers and a couple of us are students. We strive to keep our home a welcoming, creative, and safe space. We share food and split up chores. It’s a wonderful environment and will be even more wonderful once our empty room is filled! 
Please please please reblog.

still my house; still a good place to live. still relatively cheap.

This is my home please reblog or contact me if your interested!!!!

Said it once before, but it bares repeating now.

hey, look at this affordable, trans, queer, cool housing in atlanta near GSU / AUC / turner field / downtown!

great people! cheap room! yay!

this is currently an all-trans* household and they’d love another trans roommate, but right now they really need another person to be paying rent and will gladly work with someone respectful and responsible regardless of trans status

c4sale:

misha-chaos:

beefbludd:

feministpizza:

feministpizza:

Any trans* people in Atlanta looking for a place to live?

My roommates and I are looking for a trans*/gender nonconforming individual to rent a room here in our big, lovely house. It’s located near Turner Field and is convenient to GA State, Cabbagetown, East Atlanta, Grant Park, I-20 and 75/85. There are five of us who live here already and we’d love to have someone (preferably in their 20s) move in ASAP. Message me for rent info and any other questions you may have.

Even if you’re not interested in moving in, I’d appreciate my Atlanta friends and followers reblogging this to spread the word!

Still looking for another roommate. We’re all really nice and sweet and fun! Most of us are activists and organizers and a couple of us are students. We strive to keep our home a welcoming, creative, and safe space. We share food and split up chores. It’s a wonderful environment and will be even more wonderful once our empty room is filled! 

Please please please reblog.

still my house; still a good place to live. still relatively cheap.

This is my home please reblog or contact me if your interested!!!!

Said it once before, but it bares repeating now.

from c4sale

beefbludd:

justusatl:

JustUsATL is a youth-organized and consensus-driven group that provides a safe space for Greater Atlanta’s LGBTQQA (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, and Asexual) young people (ages 13-28). We offer weekly discussion groups, organizer & facilitator trainings, mental health services, HIV/STI testing referrals, workshops, skillshares, and social events. Find your community and be a leader! More info at justusatl.org, and at facebook.com/justusatl.

we’re so cute (´∀`)

from beefbludd
Sistah Sinema Makes Black Women’s History, Launches “The Netflix of Queer Women of Color Film”

qwocmediawire:

On February 14, 2013, Sista Sinema will be launching their newest project in partnership with BestFilms.com: Sistah Sinema Online, a database of films that can be purchased and streamed instantly. Think “Netflix of queer women of color film.”

The site will launch with over twenty films available to watch instantly from your computer, including some popular black lesbian classics. As an exclusive, Isis revealed, “We executed a four movie deal for Sistah Sinema online with First Run Features for The Watermelon WomenThe Early Works of Cheryl DunyeLavender Limelight, and The Owls.

Currently films will be available for pay-per-view style streaming, but as the site gains momentum, payment will switch to a monthly subscription fee allowing the viewer to watch unlimited. “The plan is to grow it into a national distribution network for queer women of color films.”

Forging New Partnerships: QWOC Media Wire To Lead QWOC Film Discussions

To this end, QWOC Media Wire and Sistah Sinema have recently entered a partnership to foster more dialogue around films and other visual media produced by queer women of color.

Says Spectra, outspoken media advocate and founder of QWOC Media Wire, “As a media advocacy organization, our mission is to promote media produced for and by queer women and trans* people of color, as well as lead national conversations about representations of queer people of color in LGBT and mainstream media..So, this was a natural pairing for us.”

As part of the partnership, Sistah Sinema and QWOC Media Wire will be collaborating with queer women of color filmmakers on PR and press communications in anticipation of feature releases, including offering audiences sneak peeks, exclusive filmmaker and cast interviews, and more. “In a society that often places QWOC on the margins, QWOC Media Wire is a critical space and platform to foster discussion of queer women of color movies…”

“It’s not enough to make films, or write books,” says Spectra, “They need to be discussed and critiqued by informed audiences. Hence, publishing film reviews and facilitating discussions about film with other key players committed to QWOC visibility in media–sites like Elixher.com and non-profit programs like Queer Women of Color Media Arts Project–are an important part of our strategy. We’re really looking forward to it.”

For more information about Sistah Sinema “Like” their Facebook fan page. Check out Sistah Sinema Online launching February 14th. Now how’s that for QWOC Love.

Read the Full Article at QWOC Media Wire | Submit to QWOC Media Wire’s February Call for Submissions

this looks pretty exciting!

i’m really glad that the technology it takes to run subscription-based or pay-per-view video sites seems to be getting a little more accessible and affordable to run - for example, it’s still very alpha but there’s a free drupal-based platform i ran into recently called videola that looks really promising

i really hope this kind of technology helps more feminist / POC-centered / queer movies and documentaries get a wider audience; as much for my own sake as for the filmmakers’, given that there’re tons of especially documentaries that i’ve really wanted to watch that have been very difficult to get copies of and/or very expensive

from bad-dominicana
ourcatastrophe:

in this photo I am chewing gum and about to blow a bubble.  I’m also holding the copy of “Loud Hands: Autistic People, Speaking” that I got in the mail a couple days ago.  I got it initially because one of my favourite people on tumblr, daxsymbiont, has a (really great) piece in it — it’s about echolalia, dana scully, finding your voice even if it’s ugly, and being seen as a person.  but I was pleased to discover that the whole thing is really worth reading.  virtually all my friends are mad radical leftist activist types and a lot of them are interested in disability stuff/have disabilities, so it’s pretty depressing to me how few of them have any kind of interest in or understanding of autism or issues affecting autistic people.  like, it’s a hugely oppressed community, the members of which are regularly abused, silenced, and murdered with impunity.  that in itself should make you wanna check out a collection of autistic people’s writing about autism and their lives.  it’s got some historical context to the autistic self-advocacy movement, some classic articles and blog posts republished in a more permanent format, some more recent writing.  it’s a good volume to dip in and out of.  the great majority of the contributions are from women, which I think is really important. something daxsymbiont has talked about a bit, as I understand it, is how autism is often described as “extreme male brain”, which both a) further marginalises autistic women and b) contributes to the dismissal by progressives of autistic people as just callous nerds.   it’s a p. serious issue that feminists should engage with; the categorisation of certain groups of women as “not real women” is a major factor in much of the violence we experience.  also, the contributors have fresh (to me) takes on questions I’ve been wrestling with for a while.  one of the things I’ve been thinking a lot about over the past few years is cliquishness and social skills and how to make social movements maximally accessible while still being as safe as possible.  this is a discussion in which I think autistic people, who are often socially isolated by non-autistic people and misrepresented as threatening, are in a position to make important contributions.  on another note, the themes of the collection are “simplicity” and “voice” and a great deal of the pieces are on communication and language.  the use of language by contributors is really interesting and alive and often different to what I’m used to.  for example, if you’re interested in Gertrude Stein-esque joy in language as possessed of texture and substance in addition to semantic content, or in literary use of the quotation or palimpsest or otherwise recontextualised words of others, you will be really interested in some of the pieces touching on echolalia.  Also, for the past few years I’ve been thinking a lot about embodiment, different ways you feel in your body, different ways our bodies interact with the world, reading a lot of Sara Ahmed and Deleuze and Guattari.  many contributions touch on particular forms of autistic embodiment in ways that feel really relevant to this reading and thinking, and that I’m still digesting. I don’t mean that non-autistic people should seek to mimic autistic patterns of speech or movement, or otherwise appropriate autistic traits, that seems rude and weird and bound to fail, but I think we should take them seriously as real ways of being that are part of the spectrum of human experience and therefore probably relevant to the things we’re thinking about in philosophy or literature, obvi.  basically it’s not just a collection you should read if you’re not autistic because you’ll be Doing The Right Thing.  you should read it because it’s really interesting.  you can get an ebook or a hard copy.  if you know me irl contact me and I’ll be happy to lend out my copy as soon as I’ve finished it. 

thanks for blogging about this book and some of the lines of thought it&#8217;s brought up for you
i&#8217;m looking forward to reading it when i have a chance; i&#8217;ve been thinking over stuff in this area a lot recently (especially w/r/t the two paragraphs bolded above), and would really like to read more - especially from autistic folks, and also especially from folks outside of the, hmm, decidedly young and internety-activisty circles where i think i&#8217;ve gained most of my knowledge of autism and self-advocacy by autistic folks
to be sure, it&#8217;s not that being young and internety-activisty makes one a bad source, autistic(-spectrum) or not, but i do feel like there&#8217;s a whole lot of experiences and conversations i&#8217;m not aware of, and should be

ourcatastrophe:

in this photo I am chewing gum and about to blow a bubble.  I’m also holding the copy of “Loud Hands: Autistic People, Speaking” that I got in the mail a couple days ago.  I got it initially because one of my favourite people on tumblr, daxsymbiont, has a (really great) piece in it — it’s about echolalia, dana scully, finding your voice even if it’s ugly, and being seen as a person.  but I was pleased to discover that the whole thing is really worth reading.  virtually all my friends are mad radical leftist activist types and a lot of them are interested in disability stuff/have disabilities, so it’s pretty depressing to me how few of them have any kind of interest in or understanding of autism or issues affecting autistic people.  like, it’s a hugely oppressed community, the members of which are regularly abused, silenced, and murdered with impunity.  that in itself should make you wanna check out a collection of autistic people’s writing about autism and their lives.  it’s got some historical context to the autistic self-advocacy movement, some classic articles and blog posts republished in a more permanent format, some more recent writing.  it’s a good volume to dip in and out of. 

the great majority of the contributions are from women, which I think is really important. something daxsymbiont has talked about a bit, as I understand it, is how autism is often described as “extreme male brain”, which both a) further marginalises autistic women and b) contributes to the dismissal by progressives of autistic people as just callous nerds.   it’s a p. serious issue that feminists should engage with; the categorisation of certain groups of women as “not real women” is a major factor in much of the violence we experience. 

also, the contributors have fresh (to me) takes on questions I’ve been wrestling with for a while.  one of the things I’ve been thinking a lot about over the past few years is cliquishness and social skills and how to make social movements maximally accessible while still being as safe as possible.  this is a discussion in which I think autistic people, who are often socially isolated by non-autistic people and misrepresented as threatening, are in a position to make important contributions. 

on another note, the themes of the collection are “simplicity” and “voice” and a great deal of the pieces are on communication and language.  the use of language by contributors is really interesting and alive and often different to what I’m used to.  for example, if you’re interested in Gertrude Stein-esque joy in language as possessed of texture and substance in addition to semantic content, or in literary use of the quotation or palimpsest or otherwise recontextualised words of others, you will be really interested in some of the pieces touching on echolalia. 

Also, for the past few years I’ve been thinking a lot about embodiment, different ways you feel in your body, different ways our bodies interact with the world, reading a lot of Sara Ahmed and Deleuze and Guattari.  many contributions touch on particular forms of autistic embodiment in ways that feel really relevant to this reading and thinking, and that I’m still digesting.

I don’t mean that non-autistic people should seek to mimic autistic patterns of speech or movement, or otherwise appropriate autistic traits, that seems rude and weird and bound to fail, but I think we should take them seriously as real ways of being that are part of the spectrum of human experience and therefore probably relevant to the things we’re thinking about in philosophy or literature, obvi.  basically it’s not just a collection you should read if you’re not autistic because you’ll be Doing The Right Thing.  you should read it because it’s really interesting. 

you can get an ebook or a hard copy.  if you know me irl contact me and I’ll be happy to lend out my copy as soon as I’ve finished it. 

thanks for blogging about this book and some of the lines of thought it’s brought up for you

i’m looking forward to reading it when i have a chance; i’ve been thinking over stuff in this area a lot recently (especially w/r/t the two paragraphs bolded above), and would really like to read more - especially from autistic folks, and also especially from folks outside of the, hmm, decidedly young and internety-activisty circles where i think i’ve gained most of my knowledge of autism and self-advocacy by autistic folks

to be sure, it’s not that being young and internety-activisty makes one a bad source, autistic(-spectrum) or not, but i do feel like there’s a whole lot of experiences and conversations i’m not aware of, and should be

from ourcatastrophe